Let’s make a blacklist for employers who willingly short wages Gabríel Benjamín skrifar 13. mars 2023 13:01 If an employee takes 5,000 kr. from the company cash register, their employer can go to the police and press charges for theft. Even if the employee returns this money the next day so that the company doesn’t suffer any lasting damage, the crime has already been committed in the eyes of the law. But if an employer doesn’t pay their employee all the wages they’ve earned—whether kr50,000 or kr500,000 is missing, or even their entire salary—the police will simply tell the employee to speak to their union. This is Iceland‘s legal framework and it maintains an unequal status quo: One group has the authorities on their side and the other depends upon their union and their lawyers. Even if the employee goes to their union with a legitimate claim, the employer isn’t required to pay a fine for stealing their wages; they only pay exactly the amount that was missing, even though this sum may have put the employee in financial trouble, making them late on loan or rental payments. If you’re an immigrant working in Iceland, you are very likely to already know this, perhaps even from bitter personal experience. Because there are no penalties, no fines or consequences, for employers who behave this way. They are, in fact, incentivised for doing so as it lowers their cost and gives them a competitive advantage. This is what I want to change, and why I’m running for the board of VR. Yearly wage theft by employers has reached billions of krónur Although I was born and raised in Iceland, my multiracial heritage means I am often mistaken for a foreigner. While it only offers me a glimpse into the full immigrant experience, it has made me aware of the discrimination that new Icelanders face, and so as an adult I’ve used my voice and platform to empower foreign voices and fight for their rights wherever I can. As a journalist who wrote for The Reykjavík Grapevine and Stundin, I fought to uncover and publicize foreign worker exploitation. Over a decade ago, I began to write about immigrants’ vulnerability to mistreatment—but the union leadership at the time held onto the belief that nationality was incidental. To them, it played no part in worker exploitation. “I’m also very sad that an Icelander [gets] an article if this happens, but [there is] nothing about places where the boss is cheating and make[s] foreigners work without any [payslips] or fair salary.” This could have very easily been written today, but this statement was made in 2014 by a foreigner who observed the press attention that Iceland-born individuals receive when exploited; the Icelander in the article had been fired for asking to be paid minimum wage. Over years that followed this article, I wrote extensively about this breadth and depth of this corruption, and eventually the unions began to coming to terms with the reality that nationality played a central role in wage discrimination. A 2019 report from The Icelandic Confederation of Labour (ASÍ) highlighted that four labour unions had put forward 768 claims for wages owed totalling 450 million krónur. While only 19 percent of the working force was at the time of foreign origin, more than half of those claims were made for workers of foreign origin and their claims were, on average, 80.000 kr. higher than those of native Icelanders. These claims, the report suggested, were only the tip of the iceberg: The real wage theft could annually be billions of krónur. In VR’s newest yearly report, is equally revealing: Even though only 11% of the union are of foreign origin, 40% of all claims were made on their behalf. This ratio has only increased in recent years, a worrying trend that I will confront. Advocating for union members amid unjust layoffs To further my work in immigrant advocacy, I joined Efling as a labour rights consultant in 2021. There, I worked tirelessly to council union members their rights and to assist them with work-related issues; I made wage claims on their behalf. In total, I facilitated the payment of millions of krónur in unpaid wages over a nine-month period—and sent lawyers claims worth even more millions to file for in court. When the entire office was summarily dismissed in a politically motivated purge, I remained the union representative for VR members at Efling and advocated on their behalf to prevent Efling from cheating them out of owed wages, holiday payments, and sick pay entitlements. That’s the fighting spirit I bring to the board of VR, which is why I’m running. If elected, I will work in implementing a blacklist of employers who do not fulfil their legal or ethical obligations towards their staff. A blacklist to ensure equal pay for all, regardless of origin Most employers, in my experience at Efling, responded favourably when I reached out to them; fixed problems when faced with them, and paid outstanding wages, which were often left unpaid by oversight. In general, a formal wage claim was unnecessary. But for those who believed there were no real consequences for paying as little as they could, for stealing from foreign workers, the legal framework worked to their benefit. These exploitative employers are the reason I call for a blacklist. Now, taking such a drastic measure would require close co-operation with VR’s staff and lawyers to ensure that only the deserving find their spot on the list. It would be a living document under constant revision, but those who do not respond to requests made by the union for payslips, time sheets or contracts, or who refuse to pay wage claims would all end up on the blacklist. Many within and outside the labour movement have tried to penalise wage theft using fines. While I will join them in this fair demand, I cannot promise to succeed where others have failed. A blacklist is a much-needed first step while legislative action is still a “what-if”. For the victims of wage theft, getting public recognition of the injustice is vital. For the general public, knowing which companies mistreat staff allows them to take a stand, to decide who they truly want to do business with. Have your say The election for the chair and board of VR is ongoing and finishes on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. This morning, only 18.7 percent of union members had voted. I encourage you to look into the candidates and their policies, and to vote for your board members. As long as you are a member of a union, you are entitled to vote for your union leaders. If elected to the board, I will make myself available to union members and voice their concerns. I will fight on your behalf. I have also engaged with a number of capable translators who are committed to expanding and improving VR’s English and Polish websites to ensure equal access for all, regardless of language. The author is a mixed-race Icelandic-Brit (or British Icelander, if you prefer). He formerly covered immigrant rights for Stundin and the Reykjavik Grapevine, before joining Efling to practice what he preached. He lives in Hlíðar with his partner and two precocious cats. He is running for the board of VR. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Sendu okkur póst. Senda grein Stéttarfélög Mest lesið Viljum við stjórnarandstöðu sem þvælist ekki fyrir? Diljá Mist Einarsdóttir Skoðun Lygin um flóttamenn á Íslandi Jón Frímann Jónsson Skoðun Varst þú að kaupa gallaða fasteign? Sara Bryndís Þórsdóttir Skoðun „Glæpir“ Íslendinga Árni Davíðsson Skoðun Mismunun skýrir aukningu erlendra fanga Guðmundur Ingi Þóroddsson Skoðun Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir Skoðun „Héraðsvötnin eru hjartsláttur fjarðarins“ Rakel Hinriksdóttir Skoðun Hlúum að persónumiðaðri nálgun í öldrunarþjónustu Margrét Guðnadóttir Skoðun Ef eitthvað væri að marka Bjarna Gunnar Smári Egilsson Skoðun Skólar hafa stigið skrefið með góðum árangri Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Á að hita upp allan Faxaflóann? Eiríkur Hjálmarsson skrifar Skoðun Á tímamótum: Sameinuðu þjóðirnar í 80 ár Vala Karen Viðarsdóttir,Védís Ólafsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Borgar sig að vanmeta menntun? Kolbrún Halldórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Samfylkingin hækkar gjöld á háskólanema Guðmundur Ingi Guðbrandsson skrifar Skoðun Aðgerðaáætlun í menntamálum ekki markviss Ingólfur Ásgeir Jóhannesson,Hermína Gunnþórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Héraðsvötnin eru hjartsláttur fjarðarins Rakel Hinriksdóttir skrifar Skoðun Lygin um flóttamenn á Íslandi Jón Frímann Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Mismunun skýrir aukningu erlendra fanga Guðmundur Ingi Þóroddsson skrifar Skoðun Farsæld barna í fyrirrúmi Bragi Bjarnason skrifar Skoðun Hlúum að persónumiðaðri nálgun í öldrunarþjónustu Margrét Guðnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Viljum við stjórnarandstöðu sem þvælist ekki fyrir? Diljá Mist Einarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Skólar hafa stigið skrefið með góðum árangri Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir skrifar Skoðun Varst þú að kaupa gallaða fasteign? Sara Bryndís Þórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir skrifar Skoðun „Glæpir“ Íslendinga Árni Davíðsson skrifar Skoðun Vörusvik Rafmenntar í nafni Kvikmyndaskóla Íslands og afleiðingar þeirra Böðvar Bjarki Pétursson,Friðrik Þór Friðriksson skrifar Skoðun Fleiri átök = verri útkoma í lestri? Birgir Hrafn Birgisson skrifar Skoðun Biðin sem (enn) veikir og tekur Guðlaugur Eyjólfsson skrifar Skoðun Stafrænt netöryggisbelti Hrannar Ásgrímsson skrifar Skoðun Hvert stefnir ráðherra? Aðalsteinn Árni Baldursson skrifar Skoðun Free tuition Colin Fisher skrifar Skoðun Þegar fólkið okkar langar að deyja Sigurborg Sveinsdóttir,Svava Arnardóttir skrifar Skoðun Why protest works Adam Daniel Fishwick skrifar Skoðun Í senn minning og ákvörðun um framtíð Elliði Vignisson skrifar Skoðun Reynslunni ríkari eftir fjárhagsleg áföll síðustu ára Njáll Trausti Friðbertsson skrifar Skoðun Ríkisstjórn lobbýistanna Jón Ferdínand Estherarson skrifar Skoðun 7 símtöl í röð - en ekkert fer í gegn Gró Einarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Áttaviti í öldrunarþjónustu Gunnlaugur Már Briem skrifar Skoðun Í skjóli hvíta bjargvættarins Yousef Ingi Tamimi skrifar Skoðun Að gjamma á stóra grábjörninn getur haft afleiðingar! Davíð Bergmann skrifar Sjá meira
If an employee takes 5,000 kr. from the company cash register, their employer can go to the police and press charges for theft. Even if the employee returns this money the next day so that the company doesn’t suffer any lasting damage, the crime has already been committed in the eyes of the law. But if an employer doesn’t pay their employee all the wages they’ve earned—whether kr50,000 or kr500,000 is missing, or even their entire salary—the police will simply tell the employee to speak to their union. This is Iceland‘s legal framework and it maintains an unequal status quo: One group has the authorities on their side and the other depends upon their union and their lawyers. Even if the employee goes to their union with a legitimate claim, the employer isn’t required to pay a fine for stealing their wages; they only pay exactly the amount that was missing, even though this sum may have put the employee in financial trouble, making them late on loan or rental payments. If you’re an immigrant working in Iceland, you are very likely to already know this, perhaps even from bitter personal experience. Because there are no penalties, no fines or consequences, for employers who behave this way. They are, in fact, incentivised for doing so as it lowers their cost and gives them a competitive advantage. This is what I want to change, and why I’m running for the board of VR. Yearly wage theft by employers has reached billions of krónur Although I was born and raised in Iceland, my multiracial heritage means I am often mistaken for a foreigner. While it only offers me a glimpse into the full immigrant experience, it has made me aware of the discrimination that new Icelanders face, and so as an adult I’ve used my voice and platform to empower foreign voices and fight for their rights wherever I can. As a journalist who wrote for The Reykjavík Grapevine and Stundin, I fought to uncover and publicize foreign worker exploitation. Over a decade ago, I began to write about immigrants’ vulnerability to mistreatment—but the union leadership at the time held onto the belief that nationality was incidental. To them, it played no part in worker exploitation. “I’m also very sad that an Icelander [gets] an article if this happens, but [there is] nothing about places where the boss is cheating and make[s] foreigners work without any [payslips] or fair salary.” This could have very easily been written today, but this statement was made in 2014 by a foreigner who observed the press attention that Iceland-born individuals receive when exploited; the Icelander in the article had been fired for asking to be paid minimum wage. Over years that followed this article, I wrote extensively about this breadth and depth of this corruption, and eventually the unions began to coming to terms with the reality that nationality played a central role in wage discrimination. A 2019 report from The Icelandic Confederation of Labour (ASÍ) highlighted that four labour unions had put forward 768 claims for wages owed totalling 450 million krónur. While only 19 percent of the working force was at the time of foreign origin, more than half of those claims were made for workers of foreign origin and their claims were, on average, 80.000 kr. higher than those of native Icelanders. These claims, the report suggested, were only the tip of the iceberg: The real wage theft could annually be billions of krónur. In VR’s newest yearly report, is equally revealing: Even though only 11% of the union are of foreign origin, 40% of all claims were made on their behalf. This ratio has only increased in recent years, a worrying trend that I will confront. Advocating for union members amid unjust layoffs To further my work in immigrant advocacy, I joined Efling as a labour rights consultant in 2021. There, I worked tirelessly to council union members their rights and to assist them with work-related issues; I made wage claims on their behalf. In total, I facilitated the payment of millions of krónur in unpaid wages over a nine-month period—and sent lawyers claims worth even more millions to file for in court. When the entire office was summarily dismissed in a politically motivated purge, I remained the union representative for VR members at Efling and advocated on their behalf to prevent Efling from cheating them out of owed wages, holiday payments, and sick pay entitlements. That’s the fighting spirit I bring to the board of VR, which is why I’m running. If elected, I will work in implementing a blacklist of employers who do not fulfil their legal or ethical obligations towards their staff. A blacklist to ensure equal pay for all, regardless of origin Most employers, in my experience at Efling, responded favourably when I reached out to them; fixed problems when faced with them, and paid outstanding wages, which were often left unpaid by oversight. In general, a formal wage claim was unnecessary. But for those who believed there were no real consequences for paying as little as they could, for stealing from foreign workers, the legal framework worked to their benefit. These exploitative employers are the reason I call for a blacklist. Now, taking such a drastic measure would require close co-operation with VR’s staff and lawyers to ensure that only the deserving find their spot on the list. It would be a living document under constant revision, but those who do not respond to requests made by the union for payslips, time sheets or contracts, or who refuse to pay wage claims would all end up on the blacklist. Many within and outside the labour movement have tried to penalise wage theft using fines. While I will join them in this fair demand, I cannot promise to succeed where others have failed. A blacklist is a much-needed first step while legislative action is still a “what-if”. For the victims of wage theft, getting public recognition of the injustice is vital. For the general public, knowing which companies mistreat staff allows them to take a stand, to decide who they truly want to do business with. Have your say The election for the chair and board of VR is ongoing and finishes on Wednesday, March 15 at noon. This morning, only 18.7 percent of union members had voted. I encourage you to look into the candidates and their policies, and to vote for your board members. As long as you are a member of a union, you are entitled to vote for your union leaders. If elected to the board, I will make myself available to union members and voice their concerns. I will fight on your behalf. I have also engaged with a number of capable translators who are committed to expanding and improving VR’s English and Polish websites to ensure equal access for all, regardless of language. The author is a mixed-race Icelandic-Brit (or British Icelander, if you prefer). He formerly covered immigrant rights for Stundin and the Reykjavik Grapevine, before joining Efling to practice what he preached. He lives in Hlíðar with his partner and two precocious cats. He is running for the board of VR.
Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir Skoðun
Skoðun Aðgerðaáætlun í menntamálum ekki markviss Ingólfur Ásgeir Jóhannesson,Hermína Gunnþórsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Vörusvik Rafmenntar í nafni Kvikmyndaskóla Íslands og afleiðingar þeirra Böðvar Bjarki Pétursson,Friðrik Þór Friðriksson skrifar
Störf án staðsetningar - of hátt flækjustig eða rökrétt framþróun? Hildur Ösp Gylfadóttir,Áslaug Eir Hólmgeirsdóttir Skoðun