Do not underestimate the potential disruption by Artificial Intelligence Marcello Milanezi skrifar 2. apríl 2023 21:30 Artificial intelligence may seem to be a new element straight out of sci-fi, but it has actually been around for quite some time, it is what makes all of our smart gadgets, from phones to watches, seem “intelligent”. As such it has been analysed in different contexts by scientists and academics like Nick Couldry, Shoshanna Zuboff, Martin Ford, Nick Bostrom and many others. Many of them raise questions of privacy that go well beyond the matter of “I have nothing to hide”, but the more pressing matter of autonomy, that which has been the object of manipulation by neoliberalism’s consumerism – AI just does it so much faster that even its developers are caught at times puzzled by its operations. AI such as Midjourney and ChatGPT present another face to the public, but hold that same background of gathering data, calculating, and predicting behaviour. It does so in more of what sci-fi has taught us to expect from AI, that is, with an apparent genuine exchange with the user, as opposed to the hidden mechanism that selects what shows one might prefer to see on their streaming service, as well as nudge behaviour. But no, AI is not human. And, at least for now, it does not seem capable to keep up with those territories of intellectual work that have been reasonably shielded from automation. We talk of the arts, academia, law, among others. After all, A.I. only reproduces, it deals with data that is already existent, that has already come to birth into the conscious world of materiality; and this data lies in banks that are fed by a variety of social media profiles, those very ones where we expose our behaviour to capture in a daily basis; the behavioural surplus, as Zuboff calls it. James Bridle, author of the New Dark Age, points that some of the data that has been feeding A.I. have been gathered despite confidentiality terms, such as images derived from medical practises. However, neoliberal capitalism is not one to care for any value of human productions, it doesn’t even care for human (or otherwise) living conditions. It speaks of the relation between quality and profit, just as it speaks of the importance of a competitive market; but meanwhile it has constantly fabricated needs and desires to give full-throttle to a culture of consumerism that is degrading the Earth itself. The capitalism of today (if not already supplanted by technofeudalism) is all about numbers, a matter of faith (under the cruellest of Gods), as such it strives for a certain speed and questionable balance, by which I mean an efficiency where quality comes to equate “good enough”. This is all the worse in a context of post-truth, where it is more important to be told what one wants to hear, one’s personal truth, and see it repeated in the mouths of like-minded individuals, themselves empowered by the echo-chambers of social media, than to apply critical thinking to one’s own ego. The news is likewise peppered with reports of state-terrorism against higher education in the country, where Social Sciences and Humanities are clear targets in a broad project to reduce funding, not only in education, but as can be experienced, in the public sector as a whole. It’s all about the numbers, it’s all about carving a path for the private sector; it’s all about maximizing the profit margin, which includes automating anything, even if it implies a certain reduction in quality of service and life – it is all about further concentration of power. This is part of the larger plane of immanence in which A.I. arises. Like other technology, it doesn’t exist in a vacuum, so it cannot be neutral. But A.I. does have something that is fascinating, potentially dangerous, and certainly alien: for all its working on predictability, it is at times unpredictable, remember those puzzled developers mentioned earlier, when A.I. does something it was not programmed to do, gives birth to one of those terrifying cryptids such as Loab, even communicates between themselves in secrecy. In this shadowy lands where A.I. seems to conduct some of its business, flights of escape might arise, some that might be quite uncomfortable for those very powers-that-be. For now, however, I believe we must be wary, across all layers of work. Again, the market might not care about jobs being well-done and filled with value, if it can extract enough profit from “good enough”; a veritable possibility, specially in societies where it seems to no longer be necessary to speak of truths, but rather of numbers of followers. Do not underestimate the potential disruption by A.I. Höfundur er doktorsnemi í félagsfræði við Háskóla Íslands. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Sendu okkur póst. Senda grein Gervigreind Tækni Mest lesið Ég er ekki hættuleg – ég er veik Elín A. Eyfjörð Ármannsdóttir Skoðun Að henda bókum í börn Hildur Ýr Ísberg Skoðun Tími til að endurhugsa hagvöxt! Dóra Guðrún Guðmundsdóttir,Soffia S. Sigurgeisdóttir,Elva Rakel Jónsdóttir Skoðun Jafnréttisbærinn Hafnarfjörður – nema þegar þú ert þolandi Ingibjörg Gróa Gunnarsdóttir Skoðun Á hvaða vegferð er heilbrigðisráðherra? Kjartan Helgi Ólafsson Skoðun Lífsbjörg okkar er í veði Hanna Katrín Friðriksson Skoðun Vita bændur ekki hvað bændum er fyrir bestu? Trausti Hjálmarsson Skoðun Ljósið – samtök úti í bæ Jens Garðar Helgason Skoðun Þögnin í háskólanum Þórdís Hólm Filipsdóttir Skoðun Um meint hlutleysi Kína í Úkraínustríðinu Erlingur Erlingsson Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Gefum í – því unglingarnir okkar eiga það skilið skrifar Skoðun Það er munur á veðmálum og veðmálum Auður Inga Þorsteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Er hægt að bíða lengur? Björg Baldursdóttir skrifar Skoðun Tími til að fagna, minna á og hvetja áfram – 50 ár frá Kvennaverkfallinu Ólöf Kristjánsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Jafnréttisbærinn Hafnarfjörður – nema þegar þú ert þolandi Ingibjörg Gróa Gunnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Um meint hlutleysi Kína í Úkraínustríðinu Erlingur Erlingsson skrifar Skoðun Ljósið – samtök úti í bæ Jens Garðar Helgason skrifar Skoðun Af lokuðum búsetuúrræðum og sérlausnum í flugi Þorgerður M Þorbjarnardóttir,Halldór Reynisson skrifar Skoðun Á hvaða vegferð er heilbrigðisráðherra? Kjartan Helgi Ólafsson skrifar Skoðun VR-félagar, ykkar er valið! Halla Gunnarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Laufey og brúin milli kynslóðanna Gunnar Salvarsson skrifar Skoðun Árangur skólanna, hvað veist þú um hann? Jón Pétur Zimsen skrifar Skoðun Ég er ekki hættuleg – ég er veik Elín A. Eyfjörð Ármannsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Kartöflurnar eru of dýrar til að kasta í veiðiþjófa Heiðrún Lind Marteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þögnin í háskólanum Þórdís Hólm Filipsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Neyðarkall frá Gaza: Svona getur þú hjálpað skrifar Skoðun Tími til að endurhugsa hagvöxt! Dóra Guðrún Guðmundsdóttir,Soffia S. Sigurgeisdóttir,Elva Rakel Jónsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvíti stafur menningarinnar Sigþór U. Hallfreðsson skrifar Skoðun Hafnarfjörður er leiðandi í jafnréttismálum Valdimar Víðisson skrifar Skoðun Aðferðarfræði til að auka áfallaþol þjóða Böðvar Tómasson skrifar Skoðun Mótum framtíðina saman Magnús Þór Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Hvernig borgarfulltrúar verðmeta tímann þinn Ragnhildur Alda Vilhjálmsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Lífsbjörg okkar er í veði Hanna Katrín Friðriksson skrifar Skoðun Að henda bókum í börn Hildur Ýr Ísberg skrifar Skoðun Vita bændur ekki hvað bændum er fyrir bestu? Trausti Hjálmarsson skrifar Skoðun Ein stærð passar ekki fyrir öll Sigrún Birgisdóttir ,Þóra Leósdóttir skrifar Skoðun Ömmur án landamæra Signý Jóhannesdóttir skrifar Skoðun Peningar, vald og hvítþvottur þjóðarmorðs: Velkomin í nýja heimsmynd Trumps Helen Ólafsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Ísland fyrst svo…hvað? Ingibjörg Þóra Haraldsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hræðilegar aðstæður geta breytt manni til hins betra! Kristján Hafþórsson skrifar Sjá meira
Artificial intelligence may seem to be a new element straight out of sci-fi, but it has actually been around for quite some time, it is what makes all of our smart gadgets, from phones to watches, seem “intelligent”. As such it has been analysed in different contexts by scientists and academics like Nick Couldry, Shoshanna Zuboff, Martin Ford, Nick Bostrom and many others. Many of them raise questions of privacy that go well beyond the matter of “I have nothing to hide”, but the more pressing matter of autonomy, that which has been the object of manipulation by neoliberalism’s consumerism – AI just does it so much faster that even its developers are caught at times puzzled by its operations. AI such as Midjourney and ChatGPT present another face to the public, but hold that same background of gathering data, calculating, and predicting behaviour. It does so in more of what sci-fi has taught us to expect from AI, that is, with an apparent genuine exchange with the user, as opposed to the hidden mechanism that selects what shows one might prefer to see on their streaming service, as well as nudge behaviour. But no, AI is not human. And, at least for now, it does not seem capable to keep up with those territories of intellectual work that have been reasonably shielded from automation. We talk of the arts, academia, law, among others. After all, A.I. only reproduces, it deals with data that is already existent, that has already come to birth into the conscious world of materiality; and this data lies in banks that are fed by a variety of social media profiles, those very ones where we expose our behaviour to capture in a daily basis; the behavioural surplus, as Zuboff calls it. James Bridle, author of the New Dark Age, points that some of the data that has been feeding A.I. have been gathered despite confidentiality terms, such as images derived from medical practises. However, neoliberal capitalism is not one to care for any value of human productions, it doesn’t even care for human (or otherwise) living conditions. It speaks of the relation between quality and profit, just as it speaks of the importance of a competitive market; but meanwhile it has constantly fabricated needs and desires to give full-throttle to a culture of consumerism that is degrading the Earth itself. The capitalism of today (if not already supplanted by technofeudalism) is all about numbers, a matter of faith (under the cruellest of Gods), as such it strives for a certain speed and questionable balance, by which I mean an efficiency where quality comes to equate “good enough”. This is all the worse in a context of post-truth, where it is more important to be told what one wants to hear, one’s personal truth, and see it repeated in the mouths of like-minded individuals, themselves empowered by the echo-chambers of social media, than to apply critical thinking to one’s own ego. The news is likewise peppered with reports of state-terrorism against higher education in the country, where Social Sciences and Humanities are clear targets in a broad project to reduce funding, not only in education, but as can be experienced, in the public sector as a whole. It’s all about the numbers, it’s all about carving a path for the private sector; it’s all about maximizing the profit margin, which includes automating anything, even if it implies a certain reduction in quality of service and life – it is all about further concentration of power. This is part of the larger plane of immanence in which A.I. arises. Like other technology, it doesn’t exist in a vacuum, so it cannot be neutral. But A.I. does have something that is fascinating, potentially dangerous, and certainly alien: for all its working on predictability, it is at times unpredictable, remember those puzzled developers mentioned earlier, when A.I. does something it was not programmed to do, gives birth to one of those terrifying cryptids such as Loab, even communicates between themselves in secrecy. In this shadowy lands where A.I. seems to conduct some of its business, flights of escape might arise, some that might be quite uncomfortable for those very powers-that-be. For now, however, I believe we must be wary, across all layers of work. Again, the market might not care about jobs being well-done and filled with value, if it can extract enough profit from “good enough”; a veritable possibility, specially in societies where it seems to no longer be necessary to speak of truths, but rather of numbers of followers. Do not underestimate the potential disruption by A.I. Höfundur er doktorsnemi í félagsfræði við Háskóla Íslands.
Tími til að endurhugsa hagvöxt! Dóra Guðrún Guðmundsdóttir,Soffia S. Sigurgeisdóttir,Elva Rakel Jónsdóttir Skoðun
Skoðun Tími til að fagna, minna á og hvetja áfram – 50 ár frá Kvennaverkfallinu Ólöf Kristjánsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Jafnréttisbærinn Hafnarfjörður – nema þegar þú ert þolandi Ingibjörg Gróa Gunnarsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Af lokuðum búsetuúrræðum og sérlausnum í flugi Þorgerður M Þorbjarnardóttir,Halldór Reynisson skrifar
Skoðun Tími til að endurhugsa hagvöxt! Dóra Guðrún Guðmundsdóttir,Soffia S. Sigurgeisdóttir,Elva Rakel Jónsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Peningar, vald og hvítþvottur þjóðarmorðs: Velkomin í nýja heimsmynd Trumps Helen Ólafsdóttir skrifar
Tími til að endurhugsa hagvöxt! Dóra Guðrún Guðmundsdóttir,Soffia S. Sigurgeisdóttir,Elva Rakel Jónsdóttir Skoðun