Protecting the Welfare State: A Cautionary Tale from the UK to Iceland Ian McDonald skrifar 25. júlí 2023 10:01 I write the following as a response to Bjarni Benediktsson stating that he wants to continue the sale of Íslandsbanki, in addition to the privatisation of many other state-owned institutions. As a concerned citizen who fled the UK seven years ago to escape the tragic consequences of rampant privatisation, I feel compelled to raise the alarm as I witness a familiar pattern emerging in Iceland. Privatisation, with its potential to devastate once-strong welfare states, is a deeply concerning issue that must be addressed and rectified before it's too late. The lessons learned from my home country's mistakes should serve as a stark warning to Iceland and other nations tempted by the siren song of profit-driven governance. The United Kingdom, once renowned for its robust welfare state, found itself in the clutches of an ideology that prioritized profit over people. The relentless push for privatisation stripped vital public services, such as healthcare, education, and transportation, from the hands of the government and placed them into the control of private entities, often to disastrous effect. The consequences were felt deeply by the most vulnerable members of society, as these changes disproportionately impacted low-income families and the marginalized. The British experience with privatisation revealed that when essential services are subject to the whims of the free market, the primary focus becomes maximizing shareholder returns rather than ensuring the well-being and happiness of the population. The human cost of this shift was nothing short of devastating. Critical services, once considered sacrosanct, were plagued by inefficiencies, reduced accessibility, and inflated costs. Privatised institutions became less accountable to the public and more beholden to shareholders, leaving citizens voiceless and at the mercy of profit-driven motives. I am filled with apprehension as I see Iceland seemingly falling into the same trap. If the same pattern of privatisation is repeating itself in this country, there is a real danger of witnessing the erosion of the strong welfare state that has long been a source of pride for Icelanders. The cherished social safety net, which has provided care and support to those in need, is at risk of being torn apart and auctioned off to the highest bidder. It is essential for Icelanders to heed the warnings from across the ocean and reflect on the mistakes made in the UK. Consider who stands to benefit from these changes, and who will be left behind? Can we guarantee that essential services will remain accessible and affordable for all citizens? How can we ensure that profit motives do not supersede the public interest? Rather than blindly following the path of privatisation, Iceland has the opportunity to take a different route—one that prioritises collective well-being, inclusivity, and a commitment to strengthening its welfare state. This means exploring innovative ways to improve public services, enhancing efficiency, and seeking alternative solutions that place people rather than profit at the heart of decision-making. As an outsider looking in, I implore Icelanders not to let history repeat itself. Learn from the mistakes of others, stand together to protect the foundations of the country, and ensure that the interests of the people remain at the forefront of any policy decision. Only through unity and a commitment to shared values can Iceland forge a path that leads to a brighter, fairer, and more prosperous future for all its citizens. Let us avoid the nightmare that comes with the ruins of privatisation, and instead, build a society where compassion, solidarity, and a strong welfare state are cherished and preserved. Sjálfstæðisflokkurin, and Bjarni Benediktsson more specifically, are fully, idealogically comitted to the privatisation and sale of as many cherished and important Icelandic institutions as possible, in as short a time as possible. The recent interview in which Bjarni Benediktsson laid out his hopes and plans was not accidental. It was perfectly calculated. If this goes to pass, he gets what he wants and privatises huge swathes of Iceland, he will point to this interview and say "...well I did warn you..." Do not ignore this warning, or forget about it in the next news cycle. An ideological project is ongoing, and it is the duty of Icelanders to stop it. I just hope that they do before it is too late. The author is a member of Efling Union. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Kynntu þér reglur ritstjórnar um skoðanagreinar. Senda grein Ian McDonald Mest lesið Slaufun, skautun, skömmun Örn Bárður Jónsson Skoðun Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir Skoðun NEI! Atlaga að lýðræði og svipting kosningaréttar Magnús Jónsson Skoðun Verðbólgan er stærsti einstaki uppruni hagnaðar á Íslandi Egill Almar Ágústsson Skoðun Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson Skoðun Grein fyrir óákveðna kjósendur og nei-sinna Magnea Marinósdóttir Skoðun Að skilja, eða skilja ekki, umræðuna Lúðvík Bergvinsson Skoðun „Vilja til að ganga í Evrópusambandið“ Hjörtur J. Guðmundsson Skoðun Fullveldi þjóðar og frelsi einstaklings Pétur B. Sveinsson Skoðun Er Marta Kos einnig að plata?.. en það má ekki plata Júlíus Valsson Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Kerfislægt virðingarleysi – Þegar sparað er í velferð en verðmæti sameignar renna annað Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Rífum í lóðin Karólína Helga Símonardóttir skrifar Skoðun Maðurinn einn er ei nema hálfur – með öðrum er hann meiri en hann sjálfur Kristín Bjarnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Slaufun, skautun, skömmun Örn Bárður Jónsson skrifar Skoðun When Path Dependence Becomes an Argument for Saying No Erna Bjarnadóttir skrifar Skoðun Grein fyrir óákveðna kjósendur og nei-sinna Magnea Marinósdóttir skrifar Skoðun Fullveldi þjóðar og frelsi einstaklings Pétur B. Sveinsson skrifar Skoðun „Vilja til að ganga í Evrópusambandið“ Hjörtur J. Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson skrifar Skoðun Að skilja, eða skilja ekki, umræðuna Lúðvík Bergvinsson skrifar Skoðun NEI! Atlaga að lýðræði og svipting kosningaréttar Magnús Jónsson skrifar Skoðun Verðbólgan er stærsti einstaki uppruni hagnaðar á Íslandi Egill Almar Ágústsson skrifar Skoðun Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Síli veidd í skólpi Jónas Már Torfason ,Eydís Inga Valsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Er Marta Kos einnig að plata?.. en það má ekki plata Júlíus Valsson skrifar Skoðun Ég skil ekki nei fólk Einar Steinþórsson skrifar Skoðun Heildarkostnaður aðildarviðræðna gæti samsvarað 300–700 kr. á mann á mánuði Valur Þráinsson skrifar Skoðun Erfingjar og erfðarmál Guðmunda G. Guðmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þögnin rofin Gunnar Salvarsson skrifar Skoðun Fullveldi, yfirþjóðlegar stofnanir og jafnræðisgrundvöllur í Evrópu Maximilian Conrad skrifar Skoðun Fimmtugt er ekki biðstofa Sigurður Árni Reynisson skrifar Skoðun Horfum á heildarmyndina – og til lengri tíma Kolbrún Halldórsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvar hefur 400.000 manna þjóð mest áhrif? Baldur Johnsen skrifar Skoðun Hvernig ákveður þjóð sig? - Samhygð á undanhaldi Davíð Brynjar Sigurjónsson skrifar Skoðun Siðferðiskirtillinn Jón Bragi Gunnlaugsson skrifar Skoðun Spörum milljarða Lárus Blöndal Sigurðsson skrifar Skoðun Drottningaviðtal – þegar ein rödd fær sviðið Kolbrún Áslaugar Baldursdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þegar náttúran verður okkur framandi Guðný Þorsteinsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þurfum við kreatín og prótín sem bætiefni? Jóhanna Eyrún Torfadóttir,Dögg Guðmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Af hverju aðildarviðræður? Björn Leví Gunnarsson skrifar Sjá meira
I write the following as a response to Bjarni Benediktsson stating that he wants to continue the sale of Íslandsbanki, in addition to the privatisation of many other state-owned institutions. As a concerned citizen who fled the UK seven years ago to escape the tragic consequences of rampant privatisation, I feel compelled to raise the alarm as I witness a familiar pattern emerging in Iceland. Privatisation, with its potential to devastate once-strong welfare states, is a deeply concerning issue that must be addressed and rectified before it's too late. The lessons learned from my home country's mistakes should serve as a stark warning to Iceland and other nations tempted by the siren song of profit-driven governance. The United Kingdom, once renowned for its robust welfare state, found itself in the clutches of an ideology that prioritized profit over people. The relentless push for privatisation stripped vital public services, such as healthcare, education, and transportation, from the hands of the government and placed them into the control of private entities, often to disastrous effect. The consequences were felt deeply by the most vulnerable members of society, as these changes disproportionately impacted low-income families and the marginalized. The British experience with privatisation revealed that when essential services are subject to the whims of the free market, the primary focus becomes maximizing shareholder returns rather than ensuring the well-being and happiness of the population. The human cost of this shift was nothing short of devastating. Critical services, once considered sacrosanct, were plagued by inefficiencies, reduced accessibility, and inflated costs. Privatised institutions became less accountable to the public and more beholden to shareholders, leaving citizens voiceless and at the mercy of profit-driven motives. I am filled with apprehension as I see Iceland seemingly falling into the same trap. If the same pattern of privatisation is repeating itself in this country, there is a real danger of witnessing the erosion of the strong welfare state that has long been a source of pride for Icelanders. The cherished social safety net, which has provided care and support to those in need, is at risk of being torn apart and auctioned off to the highest bidder. It is essential for Icelanders to heed the warnings from across the ocean and reflect on the mistakes made in the UK. Consider who stands to benefit from these changes, and who will be left behind? Can we guarantee that essential services will remain accessible and affordable for all citizens? How can we ensure that profit motives do not supersede the public interest? Rather than blindly following the path of privatisation, Iceland has the opportunity to take a different route—one that prioritises collective well-being, inclusivity, and a commitment to strengthening its welfare state. This means exploring innovative ways to improve public services, enhancing efficiency, and seeking alternative solutions that place people rather than profit at the heart of decision-making. As an outsider looking in, I implore Icelanders not to let history repeat itself. Learn from the mistakes of others, stand together to protect the foundations of the country, and ensure that the interests of the people remain at the forefront of any policy decision. Only through unity and a commitment to shared values can Iceland forge a path that leads to a brighter, fairer, and more prosperous future for all its citizens. Let us avoid the nightmare that comes with the ruins of privatisation, and instead, build a society where compassion, solidarity, and a strong welfare state are cherished and preserved. Sjálfstæðisflokkurin, and Bjarni Benediktsson more specifically, are fully, idealogically comitted to the privatisation and sale of as many cherished and important Icelandic institutions as possible, in as short a time as possible. The recent interview in which Bjarni Benediktsson laid out his hopes and plans was not accidental. It was perfectly calculated. If this goes to pass, he gets what he wants and privatises huge swathes of Iceland, he will point to this interview and say "...well I did warn you..." Do not ignore this warning, or forget about it in the next news cycle. An ideological project is ongoing, and it is the duty of Icelanders to stop it. I just hope that they do before it is too late. The author is a member of Efling Union.
Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir Skoðun
Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson Skoðun
Skoðun Kerfislægt virðingarleysi – Þegar sparað er í velferð en verðmæti sameignar renna annað Sigurður Sigurðsson skrifar
Skoðun Maðurinn einn er ei nema hálfur – með öðrum er hann meiri en hann sjálfur Kristín Bjarnadóttir skrifar
Skoðun Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson skrifar
Skoðun Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Heildarkostnaður aðildarviðræðna gæti samsvarað 300–700 kr. á mann á mánuði Valur Þráinsson skrifar
Skoðun Fullveldi, yfirþjóðlegar stofnanir og jafnræðisgrundvöllur í Evrópu Maximilian Conrad skrifar
Skoðun Þurfum við kreatín og prótín sem bætiefni? Jóhanna Eyrún Torfadóttir,Dögg Guðmundsdóttir skrifar
Hvað segja hin 20.000 fyrirtækin? Andrés Magnússon,Hrund Rudolfsdóttir,Margrét Kristmannsdóttir Skoðun
Almenningur ákveður 29. ágúst hvort vextir verða 3–4% eða 8–9% og áhætta þjóðarinnar verði mikil eða lítil næstu 30 árin Baldur Pétursson Skoðun